How much does your Congressman cost you?
Sign today.
Let's restore fiscal sanity.
Reject the debt.
It's time to get responsible.
Make a donation
Show your support.
Our Mission
Out-of-control government spending is the most pressing issue of our day. The Coalition to Reduce Spending is dedicated to advocating for reducing federal spending and balancing the budget. Continuing to live beyond our means will only jeopardize our country's future prosperity and security.

Sen. Braun proposes “no budget, no pay”

As Congress lurches through yet another season of manufactured crises and fiscal cliffs of its own making, there is no question that the status quo is not working. The chances of cutting spending or reforming major programs are nonexistent as long as Congress does everything at the last minute under threat of shutdown.

Writing for Daily Signal, Heritage Foundation’s Romina Boccia points out how a new bill from Senator Mike Braun would aim to fix some of this problem. The bill, in short, would simply require Congress to do its job — or not get paid.

S.39, the No Budget, No Pay Act, would require that Congress pass a budget and related appropriations bills. If they do not, their salaries will not be paid.

With a debt now officially over $22 trillion, this bill would not solve all of our nation’s looming fiscal problems. However, politicians have proven time and again that they are not able to do the right thing unless they are forced. Creating an enforcement mechanism for one of the most basic functions of governing should not be necessary but clearly is. We are glad to see elected officials recognizing the need for process reform and taking steps toward solving the cause of our generation.

A new way to confront spending

Writing today in The Hill, Jonathan Bydlak discusses a new bill that would make it easier for elected officials to know the true cost of their votes.

Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) recently filed a bill that would make ignoring growing deficits a little bit harder.

H.R. 638, the Cost Estimates Improvement Act, would amend the 1974 Budget Act to stipulate that the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation “include costs relating to servicing the public debt” in their estimates of legislation.
It would also require the agency to report when proposed spending is duplicative, something the Government Accountability Office also tracks after the fact.

Read the full piece here.

With, we work every day to ensure politicians are held accountable for the impact of their votes. Bills like Rep. Cloud’s would help to ensure politicians themselves know what that impact will be. We hope Congress will take action on this critical issue.

Rep. Morgan Griffith cites Coalition data in new op-ed

Writing Monday for NRV News, Virginia rep Morgan Griffith, one of only a handful of Representatives to end the 115th Congress voting for a net spending cut, cited in highlighting his fiscal record.

While the Federal Government needs to spend on some things, it ought to be frugal with your hard-earned tax dollars.

It was nice to be recognized in a recent Blaze TV story and Washington Examiner article as one of the few Members of Congress whose votes in the 115th Congress (2017-18) would have resulted in a net spending cut. This data came from the Coalition to Reduce Spending, which tracks bills affecting spending in Congress.

Read the full piece here, and visit today to find out how your Member of Congress stacks up on the cause of our generation.

Sen. Rand Paul cites in new-op-ed

In an op-ed published Monday in the Bowling Green Daily News, US Senator Rand Paul cites Coalition project to highlight his record on spending and the need for better votes in Congress.

Exposing wasteful spending is just part of my commitment to being a good steward of your money. As your senator, I’ve. been a lone, yet determined, voice pushing back against the “Spend, spend, spend! Who cares how we pay for it!” mantra of today’s Washington.

Last week, the Coalition to Reduce Spending, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog organization, highlighted how much each member of Congress votes to spend each year. And for those already taking cover behind their party talking points to blame the other side, here’s a spoiler: both Republicans and Democrats fared poorly.

According to their report, in the 115th Congress, the average member of Congress in both parties voted to spend approximately $1.58 trillion. That is absurd. We don’t have that kind of money, and we certainly didn’t cut enough to balance our budget and account for those expenditures.

Read the full piece here, and stay tuned as we continue our work to hold everyone accountable.

Tagged , , , |

NEWS RELEASE: A Decade of Accountability

CONTACT: Rebekah Bydlak

SPENDING WATCHDOG RELEASES FISCAL RECORD OF EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS SINCE 2009 tallies over 4 million individual score and vote records

January 23, 2019 – The Coalition to Reduce Spending, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog announced the newest expansion of on Wednesday. The group has collected legislative spending records dating back to 2009, creating the largest such database in existence.

The Coalition digitizes Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scores for every bill affecting spending, cross-referencing them with voting records to assign every Member of Congress an individual score.

Key takeaways include:

  • In the 115th Congress, the average elected official – in both parties – voted to spend roughly $1.58 trillion.
  • The lowest-spending Representative during his time in office is Michigan’s Justin Amash, who voted to cut spending by roughly $165 billion in the most recent Congress; nearly tied with Amash is the second-most frugal, Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie.
  • Amash and Massie are the only Representatives who have voted for a net spending decrease during their overall time in office.
  • While much has been written about its profligate spending, the 115th Congress also represents the first time that multiple elected officials have ended a session voting for a net spending cut (Amash, Massie, Tennessee’s Jimmy Duncan, Idaho’s Raúl Labrador, and Virginia’s Morgan Griffith in the House; Kentucky’s Rand Paul and Utah’s Mike Lee in the Senate).

Coalition founder & president Jonathan Bydlak says that there was a good reason for creating the tool, which launched in 2017. “Our generation is increasingly burdened with unsustainable spending and debt, while the vast majority of politicians claim to be doing the right thing. Transparency into actual voting records is the missing piece.” now contains data going back to 2009, the 111th Congress. In a time when political memories have never been shorter, the tool contains roughly a decade of votes and impacts for anyone to easily access.


The Coalition to Reduce Spending is a non-partisan advocacy organization dedicated to reducing spending and debt. More information on the spending tracker, including full explanations of methodology and dataset, can be found at

Learn More
Help us spread the message. Donate today.